PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

18 Datensätze gefunden.
Zum Exportieren der Ergebnisse bitte einloggen.
Alle Publikationen dieser Seite in den Korb legen
1.
Eder, H.* & Schlattl, H.: Shielding effectiveness of X-ray protective garment. Phys. Med. 82, 343-350 (2021)
2.
Rabus, H.* et al.: Intercomparison of Monte Carlo calculated dose enhancement ratios for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays: Assessing the uncertainty and correct methodology for extended beams. Phys. Med. 84, 241-253 (2021)
3.
Hombrink, G. ; Wilkens, J.J.* ; Combs, S.E. & Bartzsch, S.: Simulation and measurement of microbeam dose distribution in lung tissue. Phys. Med. 75, 77-82 (2020)
4.
Huang, Y.* et al.: A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on MV cone beam CT images: Impact of deformation magnitudes and image modalities. Phys. Med. 71, 82-87 (2020)
5.
Li, W.B. et al.: Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes. Phys. Med. 69, 147-163 (2020)
6.
Li, W.B. et al.: Corrigendum to “Intercomparison of dose enhancement ratio and secondary electron spectra for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays calculated using multiple Monte Carlo simulation codes” [Phys. Med. 69 (2020) 147–163] (Physica Medica (2020) 69 (147–163), (S1120179719305320), (10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.011)). Phys. Med. 80, 383-388 (2020)
8.
Pellicioli, P.* ; Bartzsch, S. ; Donzelli, M.* ; Krisch, M.* & Bräuer-Krisch, E.*: High resolution radiochromic film dosimetry: Comparison of a microdensitometer and an optical microscope. Phys. Med. 65, 106-113 (2019)
9.
de las Heras Gala, H. et al.: A patient-centric approach to quality control and dosimetry in CT including CBCT. Phys. Med. 47, 92-102 (2018)
10.
Eder, H.* & Schlattl, H.: IEC 61331-1: A new setup for testing lead free X-ray protective clothing. Phys. Med. 45, 6-11 (2018)
11.
Gennaro, G.* et al.: Quality controls in digital mammography protocol of the EFOMP mammo working group. Phys. Med. 48, 55-64 (2018)
12.
Karimi Ghodoosi, E. et al.: The effect of attenuation map, scatter energy window width, and volume of interest on the calibration factor calculation in quantitative Lu-177 SPECT imaging: Simulation and phantom study. Phys. Med. 56, 74-80 (2018)
13.
Peeken, J.C.* et al.: Radiomics in radiooncology - Challenging the medical physicist. Phys. Med. 48, 27-36 (2018)
14.
de las Heras Gala, H. et al.: Quality control in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) EFOMP-ESTRO-IAEA protocol (summary report). Phys. Med. 39, 67-72 (2017)
15.
Zvereva, A. et al.: Feasibility of reducing differences in estimated doses in nuclear medicine between a patient-specific and a reference phantom. Phys. Med. 39, 100-112 (2017)
16.
Müllner, M. ; Schlattl, H. ; Hoeschen, C. & Dietrich, O.*: Feasibility of spectral CT imaging for the detection of liver lesions with gold-based contrast agents - a simulation study. Phys. Med. 31, 875-881 (2015)
17.
Meinel, F.G.* et al.: Lung tumors on multimodal radiographs derived from grating-based X-ray imaging - a feasibility study. Phys. Med. 30, 352-357 (2014)
18.
Mancosu, P.* ; Cantone, M.C.* ; Veronese, I.* & Giussani, A.: Spatial distribution of beta extremity doses in nuclear medicine: A feasibility study with thin α-AI₂O₃:C TLDs. Phys. Med. 26, 44-48 (2010)