PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Ainsbury, E.A.* ; Samaga, D.* ; Della Monaca, S.* ; Marrale, M.* ; Bassinet, C.* ; Burbidge, C.I.* ; Correcher, V.* ; Discher, M.* ; Eakins, J.* ; Fattibene, P.* ; Güçlü, I.* ; Higueras, M.* ; Lund, E.* ; Maltar-Strmecki, N.* ; McKeever, S.W.S.* ; Rääf, C.L.* ; Sholom, S.* ; Veronese, I.* ; Wieser, A. ; Woda, C. ; Trompier, F.*

Uncertainty on radiation doses estimated by biological and retrospective physical methods.

Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 178, 382–404 (2018)
Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
Biological and physical retrospective dosimetry are recognised as key techniques to provide individual estimates of dose following unplanned exposures to ionising radiation. Whilst there has been a relatively large amount of recent development in the biological and physical procedures, development of statistical analysis techniques has failed to keep pace. The aim of this paper is to review the current state of the art in uncertainty analysis techniques across the 'EURADOS Working Group 10-Retrospective dosimetry' members, to give concrete examples of implementation of the techniques recommended in the international standards, and to further promote the use of Monte Carlo techniques to support characterisation of uncertainties. It is concluded that sufficient techniques are available and in use by most laboratories for acute, whole body exposures to highly penetrating radiation, but further work will be required to ensure that statistical analysis is always wholly sufficient for the more complex exposure scenarios.
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten [➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter Chromosome-aberration Data; Optically Stimulated Luminescence; Biodosimetry Network Reneb; Epr Dosimetry System; Double-strand Breaks; Tooth Enamel; Emergency Response; European Network; Mobile Phones; Accident Dosimetry
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0144-8420
e-ISSN 1742-3406
Quellenangaben Band: 178, Heft: 4, Seiten: 382–404 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Oxford University Press
Verlagsort Oxford
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed