PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Wieser, A. ; Debuyst, R.* ; Fattibene, P.* ; Meghzifene, A.* ; Onori, S.* ; Bayankin, S.N.* ; Brik, A.* ; Bugay, A.* ; Chumak, V.* ; Ciesielski, B.* ; Hoshi, M.* ; Imata, H.* ; Ivannikov, A.* ; Ivanov, D.* ; Junczewska, M.* ; Miyazawa, C.* ; Penkowski, M.* ; Pivovarov, S.* ; Romanyukha, A.* ; Romanyukha, L.* ; Schauer, D.* ; Scherbina, O.* ; Schultka, K.* ; Sholom, S.* ; Skvortsov, V.* ; Stepanenko, V.* ; Thomas, J.A.* ; Tielewuhan, E.* ; Toyoda, S.* ; Trompier, F.*

The third International Intercomparison on EPR tooth dosimetry: Part 2, Final analysis.

Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 120, 176-183 (2006)
Verlagsversion DOI
Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
The objective of the Third International Intercomparison on EPR Tooth Dosimetry was to evaluate laboratories performing tooth enamel dosimetry <300 mGy. Final analysis of results included a correlation analysis between features of laboratory dose reconstruction protocols and dosimetry performance. Applicability of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) tooth dosimetry at low dose was shown at two applied dose levels of 79 and 176 mGy. Most (9 of 12) laboratories reported the dose to be within 50 mGy of the delivered dose of 79 mGy, and 10 of 12 laboratories reported the dose to be within 100 mGy of the delivered dose of 176 mGy. At the high-dose tested (704 mGy) agreement within 25% of the delivered dose was found in 10 laboratories. Features of EPR dose reconstruction protocols that affect dosimetry performance were found to be magnetic field modulation amplitude in EPR spectrum recording, EPR signal model in spectrum deconvolution and duration of latency period for tooth enamel samples after preparation.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten [➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0144-8420
e-ISSN 1742-3406
Quellenangaben Band: 120, Heft: 1-4, Seiten: 176-183 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Oxford University Press
Verlagsort Oxford
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed