PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Littrell, O.M.* ; Stöger, C. ; Maier, H. ; Fuchs, H. ; Cassis, L.A.* ; Gerhardt, G.A.* ; Grondin, R.* ; Gailus-Durner, V.

Costs of implementing quality in research practice.

In:. Berlin ; Heidelberg: Springer, 2019. 399-423 (Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. ; 257)
Verlagsversion DOI
Open Access Gold (Paid Option)
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Using standardized guidelines in preclinical research has received increased interest in light of recent concerns about transparency in data reporting and apparent variation in data quality, as evidenced by irreproducibility of results. Although the costs associated with supporting quality through a quality management system are often obvious line items in laboratory budgets, the treatment of the costs associated with quality failure is often overlooked and difficult to quantify. Thus, general estimations of quality costs can be misleading and inaccurate, effectively undervaluing costs recovered by reducing quality defects. Here, we provide examples of quality costs in preclinical research and describe how we have addressed misconceptions of quality management implementation as only marginally beneficial and/or unduly burdensome. We provide two examples of implementing a quality management system (QMS) in preclinical experimental (animal) research environments – one in Europe, the German Mouse Clinic, having established ISO 9001 and the other in the United States, the University of Kentucky (UK), having established Good Laboratory Practice-compliant infrastructure. We present a summary of benefits to having an effective QMS, as may be useful in guiding discussions with funders or administrators to promote interest and investment in a QMS, which ultimately supports shared, mutually beneficial outcomes.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten [➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp Artikel: Sammelbandbeitrag/Buchkapitel
Schlagwörter Automation ; Cost Of Quality (coq) ; Documentation ; German Mouse Clinic (gmc) ; Good Laboratory Practice (glp) ; Iso 9001 ; Quality Management System (qms) ; Reproducibility
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0171-2004
Quellenangaben Band: 257, Heft: , Seiten: 399-423 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Springer
Verlagsort Berlin ; Heidelberg
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed