PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Jiang, Y. ; Khan, A.* ; Huang, H. ; Tian, Y.* ; Yu, X.* ; Xu, Q.* ; Mou, L.* ; Lv, J.* ; Zhang, P.* ; Liu, P.* ; Deng, L. ; Li, X.*

Corrigendum to “Using nano-attapulgite clay compounded hydrophilic urethane foams (AT/HUFs) as biofilm support enhances oil-refinery wastewater treatment in a biofilm membrane bioreactor” [Sci. Total Environ., 646 (2019) 606-17/STOTEN-D-18-03954] (Science of the Total Environment (2019) 646 (606–617), (S0048969718326354), (10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.149)).

Sci. Total Environ. 760:143189 (2020)
DOI Verlagsversion bestellen
The authors regret that the printed version of the above article contained a number of errors. The correct and final version follows. The values in Table 3 showing the abundance of targeted genes quantified by qPCR of the original article were incorrectly increased by 109 times. The mistake occurred in the improper unit record (handwriting) and unit conversion of the serial diluted standard sequences. Table 3 has now been changed to the correct version of the paper as follows: Accordingly, the description about this table has as well been corrected. The sentence was “The quantity of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in BF-MBR (19.08 ± 0.68) is higher than in SBR (17.11 ± 0.46), whereas copies of archaeal 16S rRNA genes in both the samples are equal (Table 3)”. While the correct sentence is “The quantity of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in BF-MBR (10.08 ± 0.68) is higher than in SBR (8.11 ± 0.46), whereas copies of archaeal 16S rRNA genes in both the samples are equal (Table 3)”. The above changes do not affect the proposal and conclusion of this study. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten [➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp Sonstiges: Korrektur, Ergänzung
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0048-9697
e-ISSN 1879-1026
Quellenangaben Band: 760, Heft: , Seiten: , Artikelnummer: 143189 Supplement: ,
Verlag Elsevier
Verlagsort Radarweg 29, 1043 Nx Amsterdam, Netherlands
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed