PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Schlett, C.L.* ; Rospleszcz, S. ; Korbmacher, D.* ; Lorbeer, R.* ; Auweter, S.* ; Hetterich, H.* ; Selder, S.* ; Heier, M. ; Linkohr, B. ; Weckbach, S.* ; Ertl-Wagner, B.* ; Peters, A. ; Bamberg, F.*

Incidental findings in whole-body MR imaging of a population-based cohort study: Frequency, management and psychosocial consequences.

Eur. J. Radiol. 134:109451 (2021)
Postprint DOI
Open Access Green
Objectives: Management of incidental findings (IF) remains controversial but highly relevant. Our aim was to assess the frequency, management and psychosocial consequences of IF reporting in a population-based cohort study undergoing whole-body MR imaging. Methods: The study was nested in a prospective cohort from a longitudinal, population-based cohort (KORA-FF4) in southern Germany. All MR obtained on 3 T MR scanner were reviewed by board-certified radiologists regarding clinically relevant IF. A baseline and follow-up questionnaires including PHQ-9 were completed prior to and 6-month after to the scan. Results: Of 400 participants (56.3 ± 9.2years, 58 % male) undergoing whole-body MR, IF were found in 22 % of participants (n = 89); most frequently located in the abdominal sequences. In the pre-scan survey, most participants stated as the motivation that they wanted to “contribute to a scientific purpose” (91 %), while “knowing whether I'm healthy” was the most frequent motivation reported 6 months post-scan (88 %). The desire for IF reporting increased over time (pre- vs. 6-months-post-scan), also for clinically less important IF (72 % vs. 84 %, p = 0.001). Regarding psychosocial impact, a small portion (3.4 %) reported that awaiting the IF report added “definitely” or “very probably” additional stress burden. Of participants with reported IF, 56.8 % classified the results as “very helpful”. In the post-scan survey moderate depression was observed in 3.3 % and severe depression in 1.2 %. This did not differ between participants with and without reported IF. Conclusion: In a cohort with whole-body MR imaging, the prevalence of IF was high. Participants considered reporting of IF highly important and added only minor psychological burden.
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Keywords Epidemiologic Study ; Incidental Finding ; Patient Care Management ; Psychosocial Aspects ; Whole Body Imaging; Brain Mri
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0720-048X
e-ISSN 0720-048X
Quellenangaben Volume: 134, Issue: , Pages: , Article Number: 109451 Supplement: ,
Publisher Elsevier
Publishing Place Elsevier House, Brookvale Plaza, East Park Shannon, Co, Clare, 00000, Ireland
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Grants State of Bavaria, Germany
Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen -German Research Center for Environmental Health - German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
German Research Foundation (DFG, Bonn, Germany)