möglich sobald bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
Structured reporting of computed tomography examinations in post-lung transplantation patients.
J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 45, 959-963 (2021)
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and potential of structured reports (SR) for chest computed tomography after lung transplantation. METHODS: Free-text reports (FTR) and SR were generated for 49 computed tomography scans. Clinical routine reports were used as FTR. Two pulmonologists rated formal aspects, completeness, clinical utility, and overall quality. Wilcoxon and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Structured reports received significantly higher ratings for all formals aspects (P < 0.001, respectively). Completeness was higher in SR with regard to evaluation of bronchiectases, bronchial anastomoses, bronchiolitic and fibrotic changes (P < 0.001, respectively), and air trapping (P = 0.012), but not signs of pneumonia (P = 0.5). Clinical utility and overall quality were rated significantly higher for SR than FTR (P < 0.001, respectively). However, report type did not influence initiation of further diagnostic or therapeutic measures (P = 0.307 and 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Structured reports are superior to FTR with regard to formal aspects, completeness, clinical utility, and overall satisfaction of referring pulmonologists.
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten [➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter Lung Transplantation ; Radiology ; Quality Improvement ; X-ray Computed Tomography; Report Template; Mri Reports; Ct; Quality; Impact; Improvement; Disease
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0363-8715
Zeitschrift Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Quellenangaben Band: 45, Heft: 6, Seiten: 959-963
Verlag Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Verlagsort Two Commerce Sq, 2001 Market St, Philadelphia, Pa 19103 Usa
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
Institut(e) Institute of Lung Biology (ILBD)